Weblog
Friday, 26 June 2009
-
Human
What does it mean to be human? Two arms, two legs; two eyes, two ears; even our teeth come in pairs (top and bottom). And then there are the times when this isn't true. An accident or deformity or even something so simple as an addiction to sweets can ruin this duality.
Humans care for others and themselves end up in pairs, even friendships tend to end up sets of twos with more than one paring per person. And then there are the times when this isn't true. When one person is not truly loved or refuses to settle for whatever paring is immediately set before them then they end up alone despite whatever "human" needs may be within them. Still, we do not think this person ceases to be human, although we may think of them as being incomplete by our own judgment.
Humans need certain things for survival and growth such as food and water, air and proper heat, stability and variety, exercise and learning, comfort and challenge, relationship and autonomy. If a person is deprived of any of these things than part of them will die, but not always the bodily part. We do not see a person who lacks one of these areas as not quite human, or do we? How often do we see someone with an imbalance in one of these areas and think to ourselves that they are something else, even if this "something" else is greater than ourselves? Athletes, for instance, are like gods to many people despite how unstable or stupid or uncentered or whatever personal problems they may have.
Humans have souls of great power within bodies of a purely physical nature. Except for times when this isn't true. Some have very little power hidden within their soul and for others that power crosses over so that the body no longer acts purely through that physical nature. Those with too little power are usually treated with the decency of a useful animal and are even protected with laws that closely mirror laws against cruelty to animals. Only our emotionality at seeing something so similar to ourselves die and the belief in the idea that anyone can contribute prevents euthanasia from being implemented, although many times murder of these lessor people is overlooked. Those with too much power are treated as monsters or demigods with the same expectation of harm from the monsters and reprisal for service from the demigods. In short they are no longer human as something that we can or do relate to personally, instead they become something that we relate to as a function of their position.
Humans do good and do evil. We expect this and even respect a person more once we see the opposition of these two traits. We even go so far as to say that we have seen the humanity of a evil person when we hear of the good expectations and broken good that accompanied that person becoming what they have become. Likewise we do not truly view a person as human when they are good unless we can see some selfishness or hatred or pride or some other carnal misvirtue that taints the good that is within them. What happens, though, when this division cannot be so easily made? Many psychopaths have learned that through manipulation and use of evil they can have whatever they want and only need fake whatever virtue may be required until the point where this false "good" can lead to a pay-off. Do we view this person as human despite the fact that they have no interest in good, besides whatever "good" may come in the form of selfish gain? Rarely, although we would never want to truly interact with this person once we know what they are. Would we be any kinder to a person who has chosen good despite numerous tragedies and not have it be little more than pity? Would we accept a person who gives freely expecting nothing in return without loosing our appreciation of their generosity, without forgetting the personal cost to the person who is giving, and while remembering how much this person is still like us and less like a vending machine? Would we remember that a person who gives strength and comfort out of a vast store of seemingly endless strength still needs help and comfort despite the fact that they have the capability to continue alone by their own strength? Can we truly accept the humanity of a person if we see them only through pity or as a resource or as a stone?
The truly sad thing is that our treatment of the humanity of another almost always is based on how much like ourselves we view them to be. For the average person this serves to their advantage assuring them a greater level of humanity and allowing them to be accepted for the person that they are. For those who are not average the world is much different and disheartening. Some form groups of these outcasts and regain their humanity within that group. Some seek to gain a facade of an accepted humanity by forcing others to treat them the way anyone else would be treated (often through laws or guilting others into different action). Some even become less like others so as to have something to hold against those others when their humanity is slighted, thus allowing them to join the outcasts. Some take advantage of some exceptional attribute to allow themselves to be raised above the level of "human" and gain recognition, if not understanding. And then there are those people who have no group to join, or direct injury to correct, or exceptional attribute to milk. They can either hide what they are and hope to be accepted as just another human, or not. There will always be more psychopaths than exceptionally good people because at least the psychopaths get something out of what they do and are despised for something that they have rightly done wrong. Those that are good are leached dry until they break or are despised for simply being something that others either cannot or do not choose to be. Such is the world we live in and despite the pain that comes from seeing a good person break there is little I can do to reassure them that they can be both good and human when even their closest friends are more willing to accept the evil as them rather than to see the broken good. How can I be there for them when any comfort from this one is outweighed by the rejection of dozens? What good am I if I cannot even help the one person in my life who needs and deserves it most? How can I live with myself when my actions can only add to a hope that is sure to fail due to other people's humanity and, worse yet, due to my own humanity? I do not know. Perhaps this paring is impossible, still I will try regardless of what it does to me. A "life" of hope left unfulfilled is little more than death still walking. That is all.
Tuesday, 09 June 2009
-
Thinking Too Much
I think too much. I have reached that conclusion with only one small caveat, I have no clue how much is "too much" or what this means for the prospect of me ever having a happy life. I don't think that thinking less would even really fix things at this point, I may have passed the point of no return. Knowledge is power, and power is an aphrodisiac; but people fear what they cannot understand and control, and real trust breaks down in an atmosphere of fear. The only way God seems to get away with it is by forcing the limitation on himself of not denying free choice and through people's ignorance. They simply don't know what he is capable of and so they lack fear of that thing that they could otherwise neither understand nor control. Although, to be fair, I don't know where meddling might be acceptable as influence or where it might cross the line into manipulation. To be fair, most people still hate God or horribly misrepresent him despite everything he does. To be fair, I can only hold up so many relationships at a time and if those fail than I am back to square zero.
Mabie an example would help.
What is "romantic"? Most people will give examples and try to guess at certain far off ideals of intimate circumstances but have no idea what the underlying concept means. I do.
FAIR WARNING: what I'm about to explain will make anyone to be viewed as a freak by most anyone else who knows that you have this information and will eternally make your actions suspect as not being real but instead being contrived to "fake" the subject that I am about to explain. Those wishing to live in ignorance (as ignorance, in this case, truly is bliss) can skip down to after the "Spoilers Over" section. Unfortunately, for those skeptics who think I am all talk, I probably still have to explain this (and even then they will probably reject it anyways). Perhapse someone can actually find some use in this little trease. The subject is "what makes things romantic.
Romance can be defined as something that draws one in by some desirable characteristic yet retains enough opposing characteristics to make the thing all but useless for most any cause other than as the carrier of those desirable characteristics. By the way, those "desirable characteristics" are specific, but hopefully you can figure that part out on your own. Some examples: Giving a girl a pocketknife to use shows concern and care and may be "sweet" but it is not romantic. Giving a girl a cut flower that will fade in a few days, can never grow, and has no real use other than being pretty also shows concern and care yet is more than sweet, it is "romantic". Likewise giving a girl a potted flower is a lot less romantic than a cut one since the cut one can only be used as the carrier of the message of caring while the potted flower can be used for gardening. What happens in the case that the girl is an avid gardener, wouldn't the potted flower be romantic then? Yes, but in that case the usefulness of the flower as specifically "something to plant" is reduced because, as a gardener, she has plenty of things to plant and this is just one more of many! Of course the same thing can happen to almost any object under the right circumstances, what is important is that the primary purpose is the passing along of those desirable characteristics and that any other useful characteristics are robbed from the thing. Take that pocketknife above as an example: If, the pocketknife is given in response to a need than it is nice but if the girl can't use the knife or if she already has plenty of the on her own (assuming that it isn't just given to her as a substitute for the trash) than it suddenly becomes romantic.
Romance depends on the hope and draw toward that "desirable characteristic" and so works best when circumstances are arranged to create an all-or-nothing type circumstance where if things go right you can ride it as far as you can go because otherwise if they go wrong the are very very wrong. Take a candlelit dinner in private or a walk on the empty beach at night. Both of these are very romantic settings, but still somewhat impractical due to certain circumstances. The dinner could just as easily be in a fine restaurant and the walk could just as easily be at a well lit, but quiet, location closer to civilization; but then neither of these things is nearly as romantic. The difference is that if things go well it is automatically countered by the fear of how things could have gone wrong. On the lighter end of things a failed conversation would simply drag on without something else to focus on or other people to keep things going. On the darker side there is the knowledge that, however things turn out, there was the opportunity for the guy to take advantage of the girl since there was no one else around. If nothing happens on that moonlit stroll than it is automatically romantic. If the guy leads her out onto the beach, comments on how they are alone with only the moon and the stars, remarks on how the only sound is the waves of the beach and the beating of two hearts, and then kisses her...that is even more romantic. (For those who didn't get it (from a slightly cynical point of view) he just told her that they were completely alone where nobody could see or hear what might happen and then started to move in sexually, although it sounds so much less "romantic" when I say it that way (although it may qualify (depending on personal opinion) as "hot" or "hawt" (which is a subclassification that has a lot to do with flirting and other boundry pushing exercises))). Even if, while kissing, the guy's hands start to wander but he stops his wandering hands when she tells him to take things slowly the circumstance is still romantic because of the setting. If the couple were sitting around a well lit room watching tv, began making out, and then things started to get too heated and the girl asked him to take things slowly than that would be anything but romantic. You might even (depending on the circumstances) think of the guy as a creep for trying. This is true even though the guy in the well-lit appartment may have had no more intention of taking advantage of the girl than the guy on the beach and even though both may have gotten caught up in the moment in exactly the same way.
Romance is therfore generally seen more frequently (but not exclusively) in girls without a great deal of maturity, idealists who may or may not be living in the real world (some may be mature depending on their personal circumstances, others keep their beliefs by immaturity), and people who pride themselves on having unbalanced lives (sometimes known as people who throw themselves into things without a thought (which usually shows immaturity when done correctly) or as people who make a high goal out of the process (which often leads to a reduction of any broader benefits that may come out of the experience)). As I said before, these are not the only places that romantic behavior is exhibited or where things are interpreted romantically, but they are the most frequent. The problem is that, as with anything where an unstable outcome increases the effectivity, the potency diminishes over time as the people get to know each other and begin to trust each other. This problem can be circumvented if trust never develops, but that generally is only the case in abusive (and mutually abusive) relationships and prevents the relationship from reaching maturity. Mature relationships are difficult to grow and so many people are increasingly choosing to stick with the easier to maintain and regain, adrenaline and phenylethlamine filled (phenylethlamine is a natural mood raising neurochemical that accompanies the honeymood phase of relationships), and less mature form of relationships. This choice has a lot of other advantages as well, but I won't get into that now. The up side is that, so long as the same gestures don't loose their meaning and become stale or so long as new gestures can be found, romance never has to end in a relationship. Couples who have been together for years can be extremely romantic finding meaning in such simple things as doing the dishes or laundry. The fact that they don't need to be done, they could be easily left for their partner, is what makes them romantic. Remember, it is not the thing you do but how that desirable characteristic shines through the thing.
Spoilers Over: And there you have it. A fairly complete explanation of what "romance" is and how it works. I tried not to go into too much detail and to not go onto too many rabit trails and so I could probably write a lot more if I were to go into a more through explanation of some of the surrounding issues, especially how it breaks down and the personal mindstate of people who are experiencing this thing. And that is exactly the problem: not only do I threaten that I could write a lot more on the subject after writing something like 4 pages on the basics, but I actually could write a lot more on the subject and still keep it focused on the specific subject at hand!
What more can I say, what else is there to say? I think I am justified in calling myself a freak, from other people's point of view anyway (and I'm still not sure what to call myself). I can either keep silent, and have people only be a friend to part of me as they can't really know anything deeper; or speak, and be treated like a blowhard or a mad scientist. Dammed if you do, dammed if you don't. What a way to live your life. What a bunch of questions that I have to constantly work out. But, in the end, that's life.
Tuesday, 07 April 2009
-
Unexplained and Unspoken Heavyness
Unexplained and Unspoken Heavyness
Twisted, turned, changed from without
an open heart broken by breaking people
pain not spoken yet intimately understood
another's trouble has become my burden
And I, if there is any meaning in that word,
am lost in trouble I do not know
am consumed by pain, ignorant of the cause
am broken by a blow that did not strike me
My choice has been to accept another
the result is often pain
the option to reject has been ignored
because the real is not always comfortable
Yet I must wonder at the necessity
if I might be asking too much of myself
if I am taking a burden that is not right
if being more than one is unreasonable.
For now, by choise to not seperate, I continue.
Monday, 06 April 2009
-
Four Letter Words:
Four Letter Words:
Those who have been around me a while know that it can be extremely rare to hear me swear. I generally just try to make my point with less inflammatory language unless I think that the situation really calls for something a little over the top. The one exception to this comes when I am quoting someone else's words, in which case I just say what they have said. It isn't that I am morally opposed to that language, I just prefer to save it for when it is really needed.
Recently the words "what the fuck" have been running through my head over and over, which is ironically unfortunate because the situation has to do with a girl and I am still far too confused right now to be thinking anything about stuff like that. Of course, even that I am jumping to that connection confuses me, which only serves to complicate the matter.
The problem starts out like this: (1) If six months ago someone were to ask me to describe everything that I would want in a girl I would have had a difficult time for two reasons: 1. I'm a bit paranoid about thinking about anything good that might happen to me since stuff falls apart, and 2. I have developed a habit of not being open about myself as a way to protect myself against those who would use that information maliciously (even to the point of thinking about the thing in such a way so far removed from words that it can be difficult to translate it into a form that others can understand). (2) I've run into a girl who fits me better than anything that I could have ever described. Things that no human or demon could have possibly known about (and believe me, I've gotten pretty good at hiding things when I need to) are true about this girl in a way that makes me wonder if I'm seeing things clearly. But mabie things are not quite as perfect a fit as I think them to be.
Then I talked with her and realized something...
"Oh, Fuck"... no, wait, bad choice of words again. I can't be thinking about that right now. How about "Oh, Shit"? Yeah, that should work a lot better.
The problem continues like this, about a year ago I had to deal with the ending of a really hard relationship. I had known that it would end and how bad it would be but I couldn't keep things from developing. In the end, after my prediction came true, I just wished that I hadn't kept her at a distance for almost the entire 3 years I knew her. I have learned to take a lot of pain, I have to be able to for other reasons, but this still left me barely able to move (and that only by a force of will) for a week and I didn't completely get back to normal for a large number of months. My one regret was that I didn't make the most of the time I had with her but tried to keep her at a distance. Still, I knew I would get better eventually, this time I'm not so sure.
"AH, Hell". This is kinda messed up.
I can't run away, I care for her too much to ever to that to someone like her, but staying could ruin me, but experience tells me that it wouldn't work anyways (so even if she wouldn't care that I was gone it is impossible to hold on to that delusion), but even if things DO work out they will be really hard. Talk about being stuck between a rock and a hard place, this is more like the choice between the frying pan and the fire.
Then there is that other four letter word that I have been trying to avoid all this time: Love. There have been other people who I connected with and nothing ever became of it because of the lack of that thing (I am a different person now). There are people who I have nothing in common with that I can't just disappear from because of that thing. Even in this specific situation people have warned me away from her and logic says that I should listen. But this four letter word, and the one who gave it to me (the LORD), have left me unable to listen to anything else. The word and the one who personifies that word both tell me that I can't leave her behind. So no matter what happens, no matter how much it may hurt, no matter how confused I may become, no matter what the consequences may be on myself, unconditionally I will love her in every way I can.
With every other four letter word that comes to mind with this situation (Fuck, Shit, Kunt, Hell, Damn, and a few others) there is one that, while no less shocking and some think as just as inflammatory, rings through my head with much more love. ****
9/21/08 -
Draning the Sea
Draning the Sea
I am floating in the ocean by invisible strings of iron, hanging from the sun,
Struggling to not be overwhelmed by the salt water, It is too much for me alone.
What is close to me is enough to drown any mortal beast, but still I drink it all.
My hope is to allow the warmth from above to reach the drowning.
We realize that what we are accomplishing is a drop in the ocean. But if this drop were not in the ocean, it would be missed.—Mother Teresa
If not me, than who?—Scott H.
On another note sometimes what you want to do or heal is actually there for a very good reason, as uncomfortable as that may be to accept sometimes. It is a lesson that I know I have to learn even though I really do hate the fact that certain bad things can only be prevented, due usually to our own decisions and scars, to something else that is a little less bad. In the end both the good and the bad will always end up showing their true colors, but the good can often take longer since the worst things always disguise themselves and the truly good things do not separate themselves from this broken reality. I could go on about how and why things happen. I know all of the reasons intimately but the point still remains that I wish the understanding was not necessary. Some people have that wish fulfilled, we call them "naive". Other people understand but have no desire to change things, we call them "hardened" or even "cruel". But the problem becomes that those who see the worst can get overwhelmed and either be drowned or accept those things as good that they have taken into themselves. There is a point in all this mess I have just written, congratulations to you if you can recognize it.
DDT.
10/11/08
- browse entries:
- older »
Top Tags
[no tags]
DDTtheEnder
Connect
Archives
Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save"
above and refresh the page.
About Me
-
I am more than what you know, can be nothing less, and yet wish that the lives of others could take in what the life of me is.
Subscriptions
Groups
[no groups]
Pulse
DDTtheEnder has no pulse!...
Photostrip
[no photos]
Recommended
[no recommendations]



Chatboard (0)